#FreeMilo: Twitter’s Stance Against Freedom of Speech
Whether you’ve seen it or not, you at
least know of the female Ghostbusters reboot that has hit theaters.
You probably also know about the divisiveness it’s created within the
ranks of moviegoers. Don’t worry though, this isn’t yet another review
of the film, but a look at what it’s exposing in the social media
landscape.
After writing a negative review on Ghostbusters,
Breitbart’s tech editor, Milo Yiannopoulos, kicked off a Twitter
firestorm between himself and the film’s star, Leslie Jones. After
receiving a slew of messages from haters, Jones fought back, retweeting
the comments and singling out the trolls. It was then that Milo joined
the feud, reminding Jones that everyone gets hate mail.
This spurred an
argument between the two, which eventually resulted in Jones blocking
Milo. While Milo did throw some cheeky insults at Jones while defending
his position, none of them compared to the death threats and racist
remarks she received from the trolls. Despite this, Milo was soon
permanently banned on the grounds of violating Twitter’s abuse policy.
Since then, he’s been on the offensive, attacking the social platform
for seemingly deporting him for no reason.
In a statement made on Breitbart,
Milo said, “Twitter is holding me responsible for the actions of fans
and trolls, using the special pretzel logic of the left. Where are the
Twitter police when Justin Bieber’s fans cut themselves on his behalf?”
Milo’s outspoken “cultural libertarian”
view, which opposes the idea of culture as a corrupting influence, has
been challenged by many liberal groups, including feminists, whom
Twitter favors, argues Milo. He said: “With the cowardly suspension of
my account, Twitter has confirmed itself as a safe space for Muslim
terrorists and Black Lives Matter extremists, but a no-go zone for
conservatives.”
Milo isn’t the first user to be
seemingly banned for his political affiliation. Over the past year,
Twitter has received a lot of backlash over the banning of conservative
voices with little to no explanation.
Back in February, Robert Stacy McCain, a
conservative journalist, also received a permanent ban from Twitter.
Known for his anti-leftist statements, it is still not known exactly
what specific tweets got him banned. Similar to Milo’s vague
suspension, it’s impossible to tell which policy McCain is accused of
violating, or which of his tweets were flagged as “abusive.”
When McCain fans protested the action
and created the #FreeStacy hashtag, Twitter did another questionable
thing. They made it so that the hashtag would not autocomplete when
people would type it in, despite the fact that it was trending.
Azalea Banks notoriously posted racist and homophobic remarks for years before she was permanently banned.
Milo points out that she spewed hate for years and went unchecked by
Twitter. It wasn’t until one of her tweeting tirades in which she
endorsed Donald Trump for president that she was shortly banned
afterward.
Whether or not you support Trump is not
what’s important. What is important to note is that Twitter has
seemingly skewed its policy to reflect the opinions of conservatives as
being “abusive.” If they were doing their job and preventing real
abuse, Azalea would’ve been thrown out years ago, and Leslie Jones would
be answering for her own racist tweets like: “Lord have mercy…white people shit.”
Milo told Business Insider
that Twitter attributes its growth problems from the so-called abuse
and harassment. Milo thinks otherwise: “I think the problem with
Twitter is that they’re clamping down, and punishing, and now starting
to step up bans on almost all of the interesting people. Twitter is
nothing without its content. You don’t go there [for the product]
because the product is terrible. The product is counter-intuitive, it
doesn’t pick up users. It’s not intuitive like Facebook. Ordinary
people who log into Twitter just don’t understand how it works, which is
why they have to shovel these recommended users at you so that you at
least have something to interact with.”
Could Twitter’s ultimate downfall be the
result of silencing diverse voices it doesn’t endorse? Will they wake
up and realize they’ve compromised the platform for free speech that
they initially set out to create? The writer of this article got rid of
Twitter months ago and has no plans to return.
No comments:
Post a Comment